Harvey Weinstein’s Rape Trial Defense Lawyer Attacks Jennifer Siebel Newsom, DA In Closing Argument – KristenBellTattoos.com

“There is no such thing as rape, and it’s important that we make that distinction in this courtroom,” Harvey Weinstein’s defense attorney Alan Jackson said today in his closing remarks at Jennifer Sybil Newsom’s trial of the multi-accused producer’s s*x crimes. Said in arguments.

Describing Weinstein’s alleged assault on Newsom in 2005 at the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills as “casual, transactional s*x” between a passionate filmmaker/actress and a powerful producer, Jackson further Newsome AKA Jane Doe #4 ridiculed in language that deliberately excludes any notion of sympathy. . “Jane Doe #4 cannot make up her mind that she is a successful, well-educated, well-bred woman who willingly had s*x with Harvey Weinstein in exchange for opportunity and access.”

First, the revelation of the encounter with Weinstein a few days ago The New York Times In late 2017, she released her detailed disclosure about the Oscar winner, Newsom, who didn’t marry then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom until 2008, has always maintained that the producer 17 years ago had att*cked them against their will. “I could tell he just needed, he was so determined, just so terrible, just about him and about his happiness, his need for satisfaction,” she said in emotional testimony on Nov. 14. , so I did it to stop it,” she said in emotional testimony on Nov. 14.

Nearing the end of Jackson’s piercing closing argument Thursday, potentially crucial testimony from the Golden State governor’s wife is what Jackson called reasonable doubt for his already East Coast-convicted client in the criminal case. I was repeatedly cut off in an attempt to produce.

“It was a theatrical, over-dramatic performance,” the lawyer told Judge Lisa Lynch and the jury this afternoon of often disturbing testimony from California’s now-first partner. “What you saw was a process. A very good process, but it had no basis in truth,” Jackson said in a scathing presentation, adding that there was no evidence for the prosecution or any of the four alleged Jane Does over the past five weeks. Not quartered.

Tearing more days into Newsom’s stand, Jackson told the courtroom in his closing arguments: “It was almost like it was on cue, it was almost like it was rehearsed. Just because.” That he cried the most or screamed the loudest does not change any of the facts.

Weinstein faces a maximum of 60 years to life in prison and five if convicted by a jury on two counts of rape and five counts of s*xual assault in L.A. County from 2004 to 2013. have been done. The 70-year-old producer was originally looking at 11 s*xual assault charges brought by Los Angeles prosecutors shortly after being extradited to the City of Los Angeles in the summer of 2021. However, this was cut short on November 15 when four issues related to Jane Doe #5 were abruptly axed. from the case.

Weinstein was previously sentenced to 23 years in prison by a Manhattan jury in March 2020 for multiple s*x crimes. That case is currently on appeal – – as will this LA case if the deep-pocketed and once well-connected defendant is convicted.

As her previously incarcerated client looked on, Jackson defended a multi-claims case brought by the LA County District Attorney’s office against former mogul Weinstein. “When you investigate each of Jane’s individual allegations, which is what you do, it’s clear that people have not presented evidence,” declared Werksman, a partner at Jackson & Quinn LLP. are … beyond any reasonable doubt,” declared the Werksman Jackson & Queen LLP partner.

Prosecutors called a total of eight witnesses to testify about Weinstein’s s*xual assault. Four of these witnesses were Jane Does, and four were so-called first evil witnesses. As with the NYC trial, the latter’s presence and testimony were intended to demonstrate Weinstein’s pattern and MO.

A decade after the lack of physical evidence and the alleged victim’s revelations, Jackson summed up the DA’s case as “nothing” and nothing more. “Nothing, except five little words. Take my word for it,” he said of prosecutors and the alleged victims, all of whom have testified since the trial began in late October. “Take my word for it that it ever happened or take my word for it that I did not consent.” Truth is immutable. This is not a feeling. This is not an illusion. It’s not a hashtag.”

As of Wednesday, Deputy DA Marlene Martinez finished her closing argument earlier today and asked the jury to end Weinstein’s “reign of terror.” Beginning his closing argument mid-morning this morning, Jackson concluded around 4:30 a.m. Thursday. Final rebuttals from prosecutors will come tomorrow morning, after which the case will go to a jury for deliberation.