A toxic boss is replaced after trying to refuse his employee’s resignation

The essence of any employment contract boils down to the rights, duties, and rules that both the employee and the employer agree upon. And if something needs to be changed, both have to agree to it.

But there are some things that can be done unilaterally, without the consent of the other party, provided that certain (often minimal) conditions are met. This includes, among other things, quitting.


However, some employers still try to play catch-up. Objection! Insist on refusing to honor an employee’s request to leave the company despite the card and all conditions being met.

One such story recently surfaced on Reddit, sparking reactions and debate.

More information: Original post | Update 1 | Update 2

Quitting is something that employers can’t really do much about, but that never stops them from trying, even if it’s just saying “no” formally.


Image credit: Cyton Photography (not original photo)

The story goes that this one Redditor tried to quit his job. The job is in a medical office, an entry-level position, not licensed or similar. But instead of answers like “Oh, that’s a shame, when are you planning to go?” or “How come? Is this something we can help and improve on?”, they were hit with a “no”. Not in that specific wording, but definitely in its spirit.

O.P Shared a screenshot. of the employer’s response after his formal resignation. The employer claimed that the OP had originally agreed to stay with the company for one year starting March 2022. The OP was surprised to learn of this condition, and he didn’t agree to anything like that, so he immediately contacted a friend who is fluent in legalese for help.

One Redditor explained how his resignation was not accepted by the employer, meaning he had to end his 1-year commitment.


Image credit: Idle floor

Both read every document the OP signed and nothing said they had to work in that specific period. However, the employer notes that this condition was agreed upon during the interview, which the OP vaguely confirms remembering after being reminded, but then that begs the question. If this clause is so important, why was it not in the earlier contract?

Regardless, OP came back Saying that they will not be able to stay until March because they have been hired by another employer starting in February. Given that he was an “at-will employee” and had satisfied the 4-week notice requirement, his departure was inevitable at that point.

The employee responded politely, explaining that they didn’t really have to, let alone that they were obligated to meet the employer’s demands.

Image credit: Idle floor


Image credit: Idle floor

That didn’t stop the employer from pulling more tricks up their sleeve, confirming that they were factually correct about the entire employee at will and that there was no legal penalty, but going without staying there for a year. Jana will “understand. [them] would be ineligible for re-employment” and may also affect their future employment opportunities, should one contact the company for a referral. Contacted the OP, who provided more context and perspective on the issue:

“I don’t think they want to have me on the board, in a way, had anything to do with me. The company has a high turnover rate. It’s an entry-level position aimed at higher education and a job in the medical field. There is a step to take for people who want to achieve.


“Combined with the fact that they pay less, people obviously don’t like to stay long. I imagine my boss was just told that they had to keep people for at least a year. to be maintained and not given the freedom to make changes that would encourage people to stay.

To top it all off, he was also named Employee of the Year, which wasn’t random in light of everything up until that point, but he explained that these two lines of communication weren’t connected.

Image credit: Idle floor

Given all that tension, it was surprising to get another, but final, update to this story. Shared by the OP. Another screenshot An email congratulating them on being Employee of the Year. It seems like this is a case of mixed signals, but the OP made it clear in our interview that these are two separate streams of communication, unconnected and therefore worth keeping the OP on board, given the context. Not deliberately attempted.

“I think Employee of the Year is real. That email skipped my boss and came straight from the CEO. It went to 6 people in several states, and came with a bonus. It makes no sense to me. If it was anything other than genuine, and because of me, the problems probably happened after that decision and didn’t reach the CEO.

People online were quick to point out the need to read the agreement and generate discussion about how to approach it.

After all this, the employer seems to have backed away from the matter. The OP explained that there has been no further communication since the last congratulatory screenshot on Reddit, yet after receiving the February schedule, they realized they weren’t on it. Therefore, we can only assume that the employer has accepted it.

Image credit: Linux Journal (not original image)

Now, the technicalities and legalities of whether employers have the right to refuse someone’s resignation are not as well documented, but the general consensus seems to be that Not really, unless the contract says otherwise..

In most cases, employment is treated on an “at-will” basis, meaning you can leave if you want. Conditions may be put in place to ensure that there is adequate notice and that the work is completed, but beyond that, abandonment is certain.

Question has been discussed In various ways and all of them were resolved in one way or another between the employee and the employer and eventually parted ways without penalizing consequences. But that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t be aware of contract clauses that may or may not make it difficult to leave.

Image credit: Karolina Grabowska (not original photo)

And many commentators echoed this. In fact, many asked if there were any specifics to this one-year contract clause at all, just as the OP pointed out other specifics and suggestions (including suggestions for malicious compliance). Post an additional comment To clear some things up.

All three posts have received more than 120,000 votes in total, along with a dozen Reddit awards, and have even been reposted in several places.

The OP admitted that he had some reservations after these posts, namely because of how much attention they got and how a section of the internet took it the wrong way, despite people just doing their jobs instead. Of actually being corporately bad about it all. :

“My other Reddit post has over 14 million views, with thousands of comments, and that’s not including all the places it’s been reposted. My boss is around my age. I think the concept It’s hard to believe they haven’t seen it. Many of these comments are extremely rude. I understand why, there’s a lot of frustration with the employees and the bosses, but I find the whole thing hilarious. Imagine he’s not too different from me, just trying to keep his job by doing what he’s told. I don’t think such a policy was his idea, and I hope he did. People who don’t know any better wouldn’t have read the comments on my post.

But r/antiwork Labor is more than just a place for themed catharsis. It is also a place to create conversations and make a difference. And every story is valid for bringing about change where change is needed. In fact, you can start making changes here and now in the comments section below!

#toxic #boss #replaced #refuse #employees #resignation

Source link


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeremy Renner’s injuries lead to new poster for Kingstown mayor

Wrestler Jay Briscoe Dies Aged 38